The Environmental Endgame: Mainstream Economics, Ecological Disaster, and Human Survival Review

Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)Are you looking to buy The Environmental Endgame: Mainstream Economics, Ecological Disaster, and Human Survival? Here is the right place to find the great deals. we can offer discounts of up to 90% on The Environmental Endgame: Mainstream Economics, Ecological Disaster, and Human Survival. Check out the link below:

>> Click Here to See Compare Prices and Get the Best Offers

The Environmental Endgame: Mainstream Economics, Ecological Disaster, and Human Survival ReviewThis slim book is a popularization of Nadeau's earlier, more scholarly work "The Wealth of Nature: How Mainstream Economics Failed the Environment". It's a solid and sorely needed critique of mainstream economics, based on up-to-date developments in physics and mathematics as well as environmental science.
For example, real-world economics is described as an `open system' with energy, resource, and regulatory inputs, operating under a regime that is frequently chaotic due to `feedback loops'. This is in sharp contrast to the `closed-system' axioms of neo-classical economics, focused on the mathematics of `equilibrium', with environmental issues relegated to `externalities'. And when Nadeau started listing the many false assumptions of neo-classical economics, such as limitless growth and perfectly rational economic actors, then I became eager to see this breath of fresh air blow away the `dismal science' of yore.
Nadeau characterizes the fundamental failure of neo-classical economics as an understanding of part-whole relationships based on out-of-date Newtonian thinking. Several illuminating chapters are devoted to analyzing the historical development of neo-classical economics. Yet I found the `part-whole' discussion rather opaque. It seems to be an unsuccessful attempt to popularize the difference between a modern open-system understanding informed by the mathematics of nonlinear dynamical systems and chaos theory, versus the classical closed-system understanding associated with the law of the conservation of energy and the linear differential equations of Newtonian physics.
In fact the part-whole critique comes off as somewhat ideological. It has the virtue of denouncing the false assumption that there is an `invisible hand', or `natural law' of economics, guiding economies toward perfect equilibrium if government, assumed to be external to the closed-system, would only keep its hands off. Yet I think that a more successful critique would be to just demonstrate that the neo-classical model is a very bad model for the real world, except in very specialized circumstances. I also found the opening gambit of the `Godgame', though well intentioned, to be somewhat offputting.
The larger task is to actually construct a new `ecological economics' based on the new mathematics and physics. Nadeau says that mainstream economists haven't been listening to the ecological economists, however correct they may be. Therefore he has launched a more direct attack on the foundations of neo-classical economics. But I think what is missing is the mathematical development of ecological economics, to the point where this new economics supplies much better quantitative tools, not just qualitative analysis, for economists to do there jobs.
A big obstacle here is the need to change the mindset of economists for prediction to scenarios. The neo-classical economics of equilibrium is ideally suited to prediction. And in very specialized or short term circumstances these predictions can be accurate, with customary statistical confidence intervals. But the real world of economics is more like the weather, a chaotic system.
So how are climate scientists now predicting climate change over the coming centuries? They use scenarios, to give people a sense of the range of possibilities, so that we may be prepared. Moreover, these scenarios put the focus squarely where it needs to be: On the validity of the assumptions that go into the scenarios. A global economy based on a wide range of scenarios will become adaptable and resilient, instead of highly optimized for one particular scenario, e.g., 'just-in-time' supply lines.
In economics this quantitative approach was actually pioneered decades ago by the "Limits to Growth" project, though it was neglected by mainstream economists. This celebrated and still worthy project was fully grounded in the nonlinear dynamics of feedback loops and scenarios based on just a few global variables, such as population, food, industry, and resources. This work needs not only its own axiomatic development, but a vast extension to deal with the ecological, political, and economic world at all levels, in both theory and practice.
An example is that control theory for chaotic systems teaches that very little energy, if properly applied over time, is needed to guide a system that is on the `edge of chaos'. Thus a democratically constituted economic authority could successfully guide the global economy with a gentle, not heavy, hand, if it has patience and the proper levers. Nadeau, to his credit, recognizes the need for democratic global governance to tackle the many global crises that are already becoming manifest.
Unfortunately Nadeau does not point us to who is actually doing this exciting development of post-Newtonian economics. I suspect the reason is that the real science of economics is still in its infancy and it is up to us to develop it. Thanks to Robert Nadeau for throwing down the gauntlet.
The Environmental Endgame: Mainstream Economics, Ecological Disaster, and Human Survival OverviewFor decades, scholars have warned of an impending global environmental crisis. Yet politicians, particularly in the United States, have consistently shown that they are not taking the threat seriously. Initiatives aimed at protecting the planet are commonly seen as belonging to a category unto themselves-the preserve of scientists and environmental enthusiasts.In this groundbreaking book, Robert L. Nadeau warns that we have moved menacingly close to a global environmental catastrophe and that to evade this fate we must stop drawing a distinction between issues that are "environmental" or "scientific" and those that reside in the sphere of "real life." Although scientists have attempted to bring ecological concerns to the forefront of global issues, problems are rarely communicated in ways that can be readily understood by those outside the scientific community.Bringing together perspectives from a variety of disciplines, including economics, politics, biology, and the history of science, The Environmental Endgame articulates the concerns of scientists in a way that they become the real-life, tangible concerns of people around the world. Nadeau asserts that we have entered a new phase of human history that cannot be one of separation and division but must be one of cooperation and mutual goals.Nadeau demonstrates that our current governmental and financial institutions, based on neoclassical economics, lack the mechanisms for implementing viable solutions to large-scale crises. Such steps cannot be taken without moving beyond the power politics of the nation-state system. The book concludes with a call to view the natural world as part of humanity, not separate from it. This unifying worldview would be a catalyst for implementing the international government organizations necessary to resolving the crisis.The Environmental Endgame is an ambitious and timely book that will change the way we think about our economy, our government, and the environment. It should be read by everyone who cares about the pervasive neglect and abuse of planet Earth and wants to know what can be done about it.

Want to learn more information about The Environmental Endgame: Mainstream Economics, Ecological Disaster, and Human Survival?

>> Click Here to See All Customer Reviews & Ratings Now