Rawls, Dewey, and Constructivism: On the Epistemology of Justice (Continuum Studies In Political Philosophy) Review

Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)Are you looking to buy Rawls, Dewey, and Constructivism: On the Epistemology of Justice (Continuum Studies In Political Philosophy)? Here is the right place to find the great deals. we can offer discounts of up to 90% on Rawls, Dewey, and Constructivism: On the Epistemology of Justice (Continuum Studies In Political Philosophy). Check out the link below:

>> Click Here to See Compare Prices and Get the Best Offers

Rawls, Dewey, and Constructivism: On the Epistemology of Justice (Continuum Studies In Political Philosophy) ReviewEric Weber's first book is a TOUR DE FORCE, in terms of its contribution to existing scholarship on John Dewey and John Rawls. In it, he expertly draws upon Dewey's constructivism in order to critically assess Rawls's Kantian constructivism. Having worked on Rawlsian political philosophy for several years, and as a Dewey scholar myself, I worried that the book would be a mere rehashing of previous scholarly views on the two thinkers' ideas. It is not.
The author offers insightful readings of works by Dewey, Rawls, Peirce, Locke, Hegel and several meta-ethicists. He evaluates the epistemological assumptions behind Rawls's theories of justice and political liberalism in ways that I've never seen before. I learned something new in each chapter. Indeed, I plan to assign the chapter on social contract theories to students in my introduction to social-political philosophy course next term. Since it is so clearly written, the book would make an excellent teaching tool.
I strongly believe that Eric Weber's book proves Robert Talisse wrong. In Talisse's recent paper "John Rawls and American Pragmatisms," he writes: "The fact is that Rawls's views have not been well-received by philosophers who identify as pragmatists. Indeed, today's pragmatists tend to be overtly hostile to Rawls." While Weber is certainly critical of Rawls, he is never "overtly hostile." Rather, his criticisms are leveled in a melioristic spirit, aiming to improve the discourse about Rawls's political ideas by closely scrutinizing their epistemological assumptions from a pragmatist perspective.
Anyone seriously interested in political ideas should DEFINITELY read this book.Rawls, Dewey, and Constructivism: On the Epistemology of Justice (Continuum Studies In Political Philosophy) OverviewInRawls, Dewey, and Constructivism, Eric Weber examines and critiques John Rawls' epistemology and the unresolved tension - inherited from Kant - between Representationalism and Constructivism in Rawls' work.Weber argues that, despite Rawls' claims to be a constructivist, his unexplored Kantian influences cause several problems. In particular, Weber criticises Rawls' failure to explain the origins of conceptions of justice, his understanding of "persons" and his revival of Social Contract Theory. Drawing on the work of John Dewey to resolve these problems, the book argues for a rigorously constructivist approach to the concept of justice and explores the practical implications of such an approach for Education.

Want to learn more information about Rawls, Dewey, and Constructivism: On the Epistemology of Justice (Continuum Studies In Political Philosophy)?

>> Click Here to See All Customer Reviews & Ratings Now